Dogpiling (Internet)

From HandWiki
Short description: A form of online harassment
An example of dogpiling

Dog-piling, or a dog-pile is a form of online harassment[1] or online abuse characterized by having groups of harassers target the same victim. Examples of online abuse include flaming, doxing (online release of personal information without consent), impersonation, and public shaming.[2][3] Dog-pilers often focus on harassing, exposing, or punishing a target for an opinion that the group does not agree with, or just simply for the sake of being a bully and targeting a victim.[3] Participants use criticism and/or insults [3][4][5] to target a single person.[6] In some definitions, it also includes sending private messages.[7]

History

Today, the use of dog-pile is most popular in terms of the internet in the form of online harassment. For example, the term dog-piling is used in reference to the Gamergate harassment campaign.[8][9][10]

See also

References

  1. "dog-pile" (in en-US). https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/dog-pile/. 
  2. "When Online Harassment is Perceived as Justified". https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/viewFile/17902/16993. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 "Defining Online Harassment". 11 April 2018. https://onlineharassmentfieldmanual.pen.org/defining-online-harassment-a-glossary-of-terms/#mob. 
  4. Blackwell, Lindsay; Chen, Tianying; Schoenebeck, Sarita; Lampe, Cliff (2018). "When Online Harassment Is Perceived as Justified (Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2018))". https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/viewFile/17902/16993. 
  5. Kiener-Manu, Katharina (February 2020). "Cybercrime Module 12 Key Issues: Cyberstalking and Cyberharassment" (in en). https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime/module-12/key-issues/cyberstalking-and-cyberharassment.html. 
  6. Jhaver, Shagun; Ghoshal, Sucheta; Bruckman, Amy; Gilbert, Eric (2018-04-26). "Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists" (in en). ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25 (2): 1–33. doi:10.1145/3185593. ISSN 1073-0516. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3185593. 
  7. Jhaver, Shagun; Chan, Larry; Bruckman, Amy (2018-02-02). "The view from the other side: The border between controversial speech and harassment on Kotaku in Action". First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v23i2.8232. ISSN 1396-0466. https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/8232. 
  8. Young, Cathy (2015-10-13). "Blame GamerGate's Bad Rep on Smears and Shoddy Journalism" (in en-US). https://observer.com/2015/10/blame-gamergates-bad-rep-on-smears-and-shoddy-journalism/. 
  9. Sarkeesian, Anita (2019-12-23). "Anita Sarkeesian looks back at GamerGate" (in en). https://www.polygon.com/2019/12/23/20976891/anita-sarkeesian-gamergate-review-feminist-frequency-game-industry. 
  10. Mortensen, Torill Elvira (2016-04-13). "Anger, Fear, and Games: The Long Event of #GamerGate" (in en). Games and Culture 13 (8): 787–806. doi:10.1177/1555412016640408. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1555412016640408.